Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Flood Relief - October 31, 2010

Halloween morning, 2010, Val, Farah and I woke up super early and pulled on our "costumes" and head out for Pir Sabaq, District Nowshera, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Said to be one of the worst hit areas in the country, where “worst” is relative considering all including family and livelihood is lost. Being hit at all is life changing; for the three of us, not hit, it was life changing - so what these people have seen or been through is unfathomable.


We left Islamabad at 7:30 a.m. this Sunday morning to drive approximately an hour and a half to Nowshera (literally translated: "New City") in the KPK region. There we met with Sadiq, our helper from Mardan. Stories of the people affected are essential, but it is equally essential to tell the story of people like Sadiq. He's a government employee, works five days a week in Islamabad and travels back to Mardan (two hours from Islamabad if you travel by car - public transport takes longer) to be with his family. He makes at least two trips a week to Pir Sabaq, a village on the outskirts of Nowshera where we were aiding in the rebuilding of a couple of homes. Sadiq is not an affluent man; barely middle class, he asks of no rewards and is helping people in a village outside of his neighboring city. With no vested interests in the project, this man was here on a Sunday morning, missing out on his family lunch, to show us around the village and accompany us in surveying the work done and pointing out what needed to be done.




With Sadiq on board, we drove through Nowshera. We saw Internally Displaced camp-sites peppered around the city; in schools, colleges, roadsides, basically anywhere they could find enough room to set up a group of tents. We visited, what the locals call, "College Camp" set up in the local boys college. The government set up this camp when the floods initially hit (we later learn that in fact it took them a couple of weeks to set this up) and since, the government - or anyone else for that matter - had not revisited these people with food or money or supplies to help rebuild their homes. The camp was set up when the college was closed for summer break. It has since opened and is functioning at full capacity – minus a soccer field which now houses some fifty tents housing at least four or five to a tent.


Inside the camp we met with a mother of 12; her eldest 15 and youngest 3; a widow, who had to distribute her children amongst relatives because they were getting sick in the camp, sans food for days. We were told that people in this camp would often purchase goods from local stores on credit; credit they didn't know how they'd repay, or if they could. Another old lady started shouting loudly and pointing towards Val, scaring her just slightly. The lady wasn't upset that we had a foreign female accompanying us; she was upset that she had nothing and was looking to Val to help her [something made me wonder why the lady complained to Val, the obviously foreign female, and not to Farah and myself].



Yet still, there was a man in the camp that insisted I help his mother rebuild her home. When asked why he couldn't help his mother, he said that what he earned barely proved enough for his family, consisting of his two children and his wife. When I saw his wife I suggested he let her work somewhere part time to help out in the house, to which he laughed and responded "Bibi, hum Pathan hain!" ("Ma'am, we are Pashtun"). Apparently that translates into not letting their women earn a livelihood. He had no trouble asking another woman (me) to help out, but his woman - God forbid! When he asked me to photograph his wife, I responded similarly "Nahin bhai, aap Pathan hain!" ("No brother, you are a Pashtun"); I wouldn't dream of dishonoring his wife so.

Shame.


We distributed candy to the children, who all too eagerly held out their hands. I shook their hands, in an attempt to dissuade them from the attitude of begging or pleading, spoke to them (in a language they didn't understand) and then handed them the candy when I thought they were no longer expecting it (I dream). This is what scares me - the hapless attitude adopted by those who have fallen on bad times. There will always be those people that will be all too happy to play the victim and have things fall in their lap. But they are victims; at least right now. How do we turn that frown upside-down and inspire them to go out and seek sustainability again, in a place where nothing seems to be going right and the government’s attitude is only making it that much harder.


When we headed out of College Camp, we drove through the outskirts of Nowshera city and into Pir Sabaq. Driving through the village, just down from River Kabul (the fountain that overflew to cause this state of affairs), we saw sites where houses once stood, various crop fields awaiting their next rotation and many other fields with standing water, now covered in a mossy-gooey substan

ce [note to self: must google technical term]. Yet, there were fields that were harvested with the next rotation and seemingly working well. There were few "houses" that had more than two walls. None had a roof. As we drove further into town, we saw shops and villagers in the market, bustling about their business as usual. A couple of the shops had repainted and many lay shut - possibly on account of it was a Sunday, but we were told that some just didn't have the money to reinvest and reopen.


We pulled into the local boys school where the Lion's Club had set up a Medical Camp for the day. Because my friends carried heavy filming equipment, instantly everyone got up their defenses and didn't want (or wanted, we don't quite know) media there. But we assured them, as did the village elder and our liaison for the place - Baqi Billa - that we were simply there to take a look at where our donations had been used. The "Head Master" of the school showed us around all the rooms, now painted and brightly reflecting the glaring sunlight. Then he showed us into a room that he had not fixed up, as a reminder of how Mother Nature had left the place.



We saw the remnants of school records [unless you could now pull something out of the records of the Ministry of Education, let’s just say - chances of you applying to college are few and far between] and library books. Sports supplies had dilapidated and lay in a pile at the back, with fragments of left-over tinsel that probably decorated classrooms. A chair hung on the wall near the door; it was elevated to that point by the water and now just rested on some rusty old nails. You could see watermarks on the walls, close to the ceiling and books hanging by the fans. Farah and Val said the site reminded them of what they saw of New Orleans after Katrina.



Across the street from the school was the local Mosque. Inside, the quarters for the Imam were completely destroyed, but the rest of the Mosque had been restored to a more usable state - whitewashed and new prayer rugs provided and a new water pump was being installed. A heavy log of wood, practically a trunk of a small tree, had been washed here by the power of the floodwater and now rested on the tin roof of one of sections of the Mosque. We were dumbfounded, imagining how terrifying such a force must have been, coupled with the helplessness that comes with a natural disaster that strikes with such urgency.


Moving around in the village, from house to house - or what remained or didn't remain thereof - we saw the adversity of the affects of the flood. There were some who were very blessed and had the entirety of their homes standing, looking slightly grey, but standing nonetheless. One such family called us into their home to show us cracks in their ceiling (directly on top of their refrigerator and television set) and pleading to fix it because they could not afford the same; all the while their neighbor's house was now a pile of rubble. I don't know whether to label that "ungrateful" or sheer "self-centric".


There were homes with one wall standing, some with three and so me with nothing. People had moved out of their "houses" to live with family and friends around the village or in a tent, balanced on the rubble that lay where once their home stood. The most unfortunate had to resort to living in a camp, just outside the village. What we saw amongst the people of Pir Sabaq was a bond - each spoke to the next like one speaks to family. Baqi Billa told us that when people brought vehicles and boats to pull people out of the village to dry land, they didn't come in search for their loved ones; they took who they found and paddled them to a village slightly elevated on a nearby mountain. Baqi showed me the electrical cables that ran on poles above the homes and said "we floated our boats above those cables". I'm not even going to get into how dangerous that possibly was.


We visited the two homes that have been reconstructed with your donations. One belonged to a lady that was not home because it was her daughter’s wedding in the neighboring village; she would now live here with her frail husband, who was disabled and could now not work. The second home belonged to a widow - who, when we went to visit, was herself visiting the Medical Camp at the boy’s school we saw on our way in. We managed to catch up with her later and she showered us with prayers and appreciation.



We also met with two other women whose homes we were beginning work on. One is a widow, mother of three; two of her three are drug addicts and the third is mentally unstable. She, definitely pushing her mid-sixties at this point, provided for the three of them. The second lady was a widow who lived alone and helped with her brother’s family and his work. He could not provide for her himself because he could barely provide for his nine children. Nine. Another brother of theirs had twelve.



We sat down with Baqi Billa and his family to talk of the work they had undertaken in the village - about how everyone gave so generously of themselves for the benefit of their neighbors. We were astounded at how selfless most of these people were. Their hospitality is unprecedented; when we couldn't eat the fruit offered to us at Baqi's home, they bagged it for our ride home.


After our interview with Baqi, his sister-in-law came to visit and we were able to sit her down for a talk. She had previously worked as a Lady Health Worker with the government. [These are the people that go door to door to educate women on family planning.] This lady was very eloquent and highly educated. She did her Masters in Islamic Studies from a local university after she got married. She was the mother of two daughters, the youngest of whom was accompanying her today’ the eldest was at medical school in a nearby city. When I asked her if she'd educate her daughter on family planning before she got married, she shied away; "she'll learn on her own - I can't tell her things like that." Confused, I asked whether she considered it apt to be friends with your children, as I was with my mother. "I'm friends with my daughter, but we can't talk about such things. And I know she won't ask anyone else. She's sensible like that." This nonsensical sensibility would miraculously ensure that these girls know about family planning and ensure her health and that of her children. Miracles happen every day.


That said, it was refreshing meeting someone so educated and someone whose husband promoted her education. I just wish they'd break these cultural idiosyncrasies while they were at it. She did tell us that women used contraceptives without their husbands knowing because they would not approve. They told us that many were tired of not having enough to feed their existing children and continuing to have more. Still, the average family in this village alone must consist of 5-8 children.


One battle at a time, I guess.


Thursday, May 20, 2010

When in doubt - blame South Park

It "hurts our religious feelings" when people talk smack about our Prophet. Not that I knew I had religious feelings that were distinct from... well, just "feelings". Mostly, I liked how one news article spoke of the "monster" that created the Facebook page that invites the world at large to draw cartoons of the Prophet. That is what brought the Lahore High Court to tears and made them pass the order to restrict that page, then the whole of Facebook (because it is innately the work of Lucifer himself), and then of course, Youtube (possibly because too many people were checking out the new Shakira video).

To enlighten my friends that were wondering why I haven't posted seventy news articles to my Facebook wall since the morning, I shared with some a news article explaining the ban on Facebook and the lawsuit that began it all. Felipe called
this news piece the most "awesomely badly written news article". (We don't have a problem coming off as idiots at all.) There's a legal premise behind all this. Under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes, 2007 - Section 29 and 30, Zuckerburg and his entire team could be fined a grand total of *drum roll* $2,300! Yes sir, that and they could be made to serve a sentence of up to two years. Territorial boundaries, you say? Pft - if Facebook is far-reaching, so are the arms of justice of Pakistan (inspired by the Bollywood "Kanoon key haath bohot lambey hotay hain, Judge Sahab" dialogue, of course).

So, all day Thursday my friends and I exchanged notes on what else has been banned by the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority (certain Wikipedia pages are also inaccessible) - and when our internet slowed down or just died, as it often does, we were all too quick to jump to conclusions of the PTA restricting everything. We love spreading rumors.

In the words of the cartoonist Nikahang Kowsar, "I believe we have the right to offend, but when offense is seen as an 'insult', it might be a bad time to draw an offensive cartoon." Agreed. Its a stupid idea to rile up the "religious emotions" of a certain group, but equally silly is the fact that we got so riled. Hina said "Its gone too far." She's one of my friends that said she wanted to boycott Facebook for that one day that the cartooning contest was being held. Agreeing that it was silly, she insisted that she'd rather do something about it peacefully than do nothing.


But how far is too far? Is it not "far" enough that we're wanting to block that page alone from Facebook, which translated into blocking all of Facebook and then Youtube? CNN analysts said that the reason Youtube was blocked was as a "preemptive" measure - people will make videos of the contest and of the cartoon's they've created and post them to Youtube, the Pakistani government, although not saying it out loud, was trying to preempt just that. Youtube is just one of the pages our government deems "sacrilege". Thankfully, the Wikipedia page defining the word has not blocked - yet (although numerous others have been) and I was able to look it up. It says "injurious treatment of a sacred object".


Muslims believe that faith begins from within and that though we believe in God, unseen, He is out there and watching us and protecting us and testing us. Similarly, although we haven't seen the Prophet, we believe in him and follow his teachings. What object, again, is it that these people are treating injuriously? I thought the whole concept of Islam was not to objectify that which we revere? I'm a little confused.


Personally, I'm a little relieved that I'm not compelled to update my status on Facebook in search for affirmation. So, I can be "enjoying my cup a joe" without having to tell the world about it - and it really will taste just as good. I don't know how we got so pulled into this. I was suffering withdrawal from incessantly posting news articles to my wall, but now I just spam my friends' inboxes. I know most of my friends are doing okay without Facebook - even those whose life and job depend on their Mafia Wars scores. But then we have various student bodies carrying out rallies and chanting "Death to Facebook!" I really wish we'd come up with a new slogan already.


And to think, all this of a South Park episode.

Monday, May 17, 2010

Sinister Sarcasm


This was a picture sent to me in one of those forwards; the ones that frantically spread like the proverbial wildfire we all hate. The minute I saw it I knew it was doctored, but then something inside me wanted to make sure. It's pretty obvious that this could not be real; that the ACLU would be all over it if it were, but, something was still very unsettling about this image. I, like any other schmuck, forwarded this to a bunch of my friends - those people you know won't judge you stupid for sending this out and will tell you what they think of it; while not letting their own political/ideological beliefs be fanatically dethroned.

Farooq, endowed with the super-abilities to articulate his unadulterated thoughts on politics and policies said: "
I'm also positive it's doctored, but its still very sinister. And by sinister, I mean the effect the creators are going for is definitely achieved. It's smart of them not to pick some seedy, shady, scruffy looking desi. They pick a fairly harmless looking guy and, by doing so, encourage you to question the intentions of people falling OUTSIDE the stereotype of potentially dangerous Muslims. Check out the way he is looking at you in the poster. Taken by itself, it'd just be a regular boring picture. But armed with all the rhetoric underneath, its capable of being a little creepy. Its basically shouting out 'trust no one'."


Naiara, with her undying patience and incessant requirement to be politically correct said (after assuring me that she, as a frequent MTA user, knew this to be a fake): "
One possible explanation is that someone might have designed it with the objective of drawing attention to the potential racial profiling interpretation that the original ad might have on certain prong minds (the original add says: "if you see something, say something" and has the picture of an abandoned item under the metro seat). It can even be the case that someone has been the victim of racial profiling based on the ad, but I have never read or heard of it happening."


I think that this forward was a little bit of both; sinister yet sarcastic. In a time like this when something as meaningless as a cartoon sketch or a South Park episode can get us frazzled (not that I think such frazzlement is warranted), someone thought it in their malicious right to create and spread something like this. Mind you, desi's are innately stupid so we'll buy this junk at first sight. I just hope it doesn't get in the hands of someone like Zaid Hamid (or maybe his zombie-esque minions are the ones that created it) so that they can use it to accent their beliefs that the world is out to get them. "Them": not just Muslims, but Pakistani-Muslims because they're the worst kind.

It could also be something intended to be sarcastic pun at the way brown-folk in general are being treated (considering that most Pakistani's are now being driven to claim Indian heritage, uf, sacrilege). Either way, its uncalled for because it's messing with my head. I was left there thinking "maybe?" and I've got plenty else to be thinking about right now. It just goes to show the sad state of affairs of the world at large (and the lack of caffeine in my system at that hour), when we'll believe (or at least question/ponder, if even for an instant) the legitimacy of something as absurd as this. I question my intelligence before I do anyone else, but it just leaves me thinking, if I could for a second be "doubeyew-tee-eff" about this, could someone, not educated and unaware of civil liberties and their importance in the Land of the Free, not take this to be real?

Sigh. What have we come to?

"I run to the Rock, please hide me..."

Thursday, May 6, 2010

"You know what's amazing?"

Felipe messaged me yesterday and asked me just that. "The moon today looks exactly like the earth does in the famous picture taken from teh moon of the earth-rise. Quite amazing..."

It reminded me what someone once said, or maybe I read it somewhere. Warning: it could very well have been a sappy chick-flick. They said that the moon is the same, you might look at it at different times and from different angles, but its the same moon, world-over. Felipe once said that it gives him peace knowing that we're all connected in some way.

I miss you, Dude.

This is one of his masterpieces (therefore copyrighted to him - I just took liberties).


Friday, April 9, 2010

Petty Scandals

This past weekend I attended a conference at the Lahore University of Management Sciences which had panelists flown in from Europe, America and India, carefully iced with the best Pakistan had to offer. I found that there is no dearth of intellectually brilliant minds in Pakistan; the dearth lies in our knowledge of their existence and appreciation for the work they do. I’ll be the first to shamefully admit that I had heard of only a few of our local attendee’s, and that too by word of mouth. I’d never taken the time out to look into the work they were doing or gauge what it was they were trying to tell us. Doctor Phil says that admitting the problem is the first step to recovery.


Take Strings for example, until they were jamming with John Abraham and Sanjay Dutt, we didn’t really give a dhaani. We all know the tale of how we found Ustad Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan astounding once India started begging him to sing for Bollywood. That’s when we started noticing what the likes of Peter Gabriel and other maestro’s of the West had noticed decades before (also, the West loved him for his Qawali’s – long before his soundtrack to Dead Man Walking). Then, we all heard the tale of how Ustad Nusrat’s grave was dug up and his body was found enveloped in his own tongue. Why? Blasphemy, of course - he used the same tongue to sing songs for the Hindu’s that he once used to praise Allah. Astaghfar. I mean, none of us use our namazi tongue’s to curse at the beggar who dared touch my clean car window that I zapped up as he approached. Never. My grave will be sound and my body shall not be shroud in my tongue, but in light - nur; Alhumdulillah.


The appreciation our local hero’s (including academics) receive and the acknowledgement their work and contribution to Pakistani culture and heritage is given is negligible, to say in the least. Instead, it is the likes of Shoaib Malik that are recognized, not for their “confused-cricketeering” (in the words of a world-renowned cricket blogger), but for marrying someone from behind enemy lines. That seemed to be all I could find on the news this week. As much as I wanted to escape it, I could only find information of the weight problems faced by Shoaib’s first wife (Note to World: nikkah’s conducted over the phone are so passé) and how Sania Mirza really doesn’t like wearing short skirts – they’re just practical. I couldn’t find any coverage of the attack on the U.S. embassy in Peshawar or the general state of affairs in the world, post Obama’s speech to change the U.S.’s attitude towards use of nuclear arms; all that is secondary to the love affair that shall be settled in a nikkah in Dubai, where Shoaib’s family can incidentally fly with more ease.


Hina said to me that it was refreshing, seeing Shoaib battle with the media over his personal life. She said it was refreshing because it “takes our mind off of the explosions and all the lives we’ve lost”. However, instead of distracting ourselves with educational information concerning the majestic character that was our Quaid (as opposed to the run of the mill, boilerplate description we find in our Pak-Studies books), we’d rather watch the latest Michael Moore documentary on how the U.S. is full of sicko’s. “It’s cooler”; just as it was once cool to smoke, then it wasn’t and now it’s cool again. Frankly, I’m losing count.



What Hina said next is what caught me off-guard and made me think. She said that India has prospered because they revere their culture, promote it, and endorse their leaders and figureheads; “Gandhi is god”. I’m not saying Gandhi was not all that they say he was; he was indeed, a brilliant man, but so was Allama Iqbal and Ajmal Khattak. My friend eloquently concluded: “in our country the going-rate for buying respect is a couple of million Rupees, not good deeds.” Sadly, she’s right; we promote the wrong people. Sure Meera Jee has contributed to her share of cinema and whether or not I think she’s good is secondary (I don’t). But that we’re so fascinated about what email address it was that she used to write to her purported husband in impeccable diction, is what leaves me dumbfounded.


Indian artist, Bhai Baldeep Singh, calls it involvement in “petty scandals”. We’re too involved in how one of our own would take a bride from the other side of the border, to notice that about 40 children get kidnapped each week from villages and remote areas we cannot drive our newly polished convertible’s to. Reports of these kidnappings will never hit the airwaves like Sahil Saeed’s kidnapping did because these children do not speak the Angraizi and their parents make minimum wage – barely. Mr. Singh says that we’re too engrossed in religious and geographical preferences to notice our real issues and try to resolve them. I believe that we need a break from the constant flow of bad news; but our media personnel should be looking to fill that void with good inspirational stories, not a bad remix of Star Plus and old-wives-tales.


After listening to all those intellectuals talk of how India and Pakistan, although partitioned, shared much of the same problems and had much of the same soul, I wonder if they’re right. Clearly, India seems to be going places we’re only beginning to learn of. I don’t think our partition with India is remotely related to our plight; it’s our partition from our own culture, our own people and their achievements and accomplishments that require more consideration. Just like we’ll come out in flock to see what Sana Safinaz has in store for this year’s lawn season, let’s see what the likes of Kamal Khan Mumtaz, Ayesha Jalal and Tariq Rahman have to say, generally.

Directly Proportionate

April 02, 2010


Studies show that the drone attacks in the NWFP against militants have caused more harm than benefit; they’re fueling the terrorists, leaving them with the want to avenge more death and destruction, regenerating more militants in place of the few and promoting an anti-U.S. sentiment amongst Pakistani citizens in general.


Official reports of the civilian causalities from the drone attacks in the NWFP from 2009 vary between 20 and 700, the former being an official report given by U.S. military personnel to a leading U.S. newspaper; the latter, Pakistan’s failed cry for attention (or a slightly watered-down version of the truth). Independent resources say 32% of all casualties are civilian.


I do not believe the American’s are against us (please recall the “you are either with us or with the terrorists” speech by President Bush in the wake of 9/11). They have assured us of “change we can believe in” and constantly boosted our ego with chants of “yes we can”. Hussain (Obama) spoke to us directly in his beautifully crafted speech delivered in Cairo. It contained all the right elements to woo the Muslim Ummah: carefully calculated pause for applaud, a pinch of hope and quotations from the Qur’an added to taste. I believe that joint efforts of the U.S. administration are working towards a more sustainable Pakistan by bringing peace to the region and *insert other oft-repeated empty phrase here*.


But why, you ask, has there been no tangible change? Mr. Harold Hongju Koh, Legal Advisor to the U.S. Department of State, explained how the Obama government had to ensure more continuity in the international relations department than change; because you can’t turn a ship around in a day – that, and they were aiming for a shift in the “attitude toward international law”. [Fact: there were 45 drone attacks in Pakistan during the entire Bush era, in comparison to the 51 of Obama’s term so far.] He reiterated how the war in Afghanistan was not an “American war” but one “joined by forty-three other countries… in an effort to defend ourselves and all nations from further attacks… [from Al-Qaeda, the Taliban and all associated forces who] continue to attack us. We are acting in response to the, horrific 9/11 attacks and may use force consistent with its inherent right to self-defense under international law.”


Mr. Koh said there were two rules governing operations to ensure that they were in fact consistent with principles of the law of war; these are: distinction (making sure your targets aren’t civilians or civil objects) and proportionality (requiring the “collateral damage” to be proportionate to the benefits of the operation).


Let’s do the math for the sake of proportionality. It has been nine years since the attack on 9/11 which killed almost 3,000 people; since, about 103,000 civilians have lost their lives in Iraq, and “hundreds of thousands” (there are no exact figures – opinions vary) in Afghanistan and the uncounted in Pakistan. This ought to put the “distinction” argument in perspective too. But, we are the joint forces who are at war, because it’s not an American war, to protect American soil, even though all “collateral damage” seems to be levied on us. Distinctly proportionate.


Gist of the story, says Mr. Koh: “U.S. targeting practices, including lethal operations conducted with the use of unmanned aerial vehicles, comply with all applicable law, including the laws of war.” As for the question of “sovereignty” that General Kayani keeps harping on, we’re told that the U.S. does not consider the NWFP part and parcel to Pakistan as it has its own legal and social code (thank you amendment number one million to the Constitution). They say that because Baluchistan is following the rest of Pakistan with regard to its legal framework, it remains within the bounds of Pakistan, ergo, out of bounds of the U.S. drone attacks; that is, until they can come up with another excuse. Amen.


I would like to say this: President Hussain, please put money where your mouths at. I’d like you to refrain from floral language and give it to us straight. If you can, try to stay out of our business and let us figure out our lives. As for the Pakistani government, please start realizing and educating others of the “numbers” detailing lives we’ve lost in this “war on terror”. Why aren’t our “Names of the Dead” honorably displayed in our newspapers and in our government buildings (in the U.S. House, every Representative has a board of pictures of soldiers from their district that have lost their lives in this war and newspapers print updates lists of names)? Why is it that we can honor the likes of Iftikhar Chaudhry and not those who lay their lives on the line for us every day without any recognition of their sacrifices? Let’s conduct a “long march” for them and the police/army personnel conducting traffic check posts and show appreciation for what they do instead of cursing at them under our breath as we inch through traffic; they want to be there just as much as we do.


Studies have also shown that generally suicide attacks, although advertised as being conducted in fervor of a religion, are all freedom fighters who want an end to foreign occupation (see also: Chechnya and female suicide bombers). Therefore, in the words of Allama Iqbal: “Let's try hard to stop insulting each other and to prevent all kinds of violence.”